Home
All Over The Map - Just call me Cassandra... [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
All Over The Map

[ website | Juliet E McKenna Official Web Site ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Just call me Cassandra... [Feb. 19th, 2008|05:55 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
Pals and other unfortunates at conventions and the like will have become accustomed to me explaining in detail just how damaging the 3for2/Buy-one-get-one-free/half-price model of bookselling has become. Of course, this mania for discounting isn't only limited to the booktrade as a glance along any high street will show.

Today we have, via TheRetailBulletin.com
The KPMG/SPSL Retail Think Tank has warned that the current retail culture of constant discounting, sales and promotions is unsustainable and likely to lead to increasing numbers of insolvencies. Retail in the UK is at a turning point and requires a new set of strategies to survive.

The key points of their paper are

The use of sales, promotions and discounting has fundamentally changed away from a pure clearance role to a range of more tactical and reactive purposes.

Sales, promotions and discounting affect shopping behaviour in a way that can be detrimental to the sector. It also has the potential to erode both retailer brands and the in-store experience.

There is a lack of transparency of the level or the effect of promotional activity on retailer health or future prospects.

If discounting programmes continue on their present path, the situation runs the risk of becoming untenable for retailers in the longer term.

Over recent years, sales growth by value has slowed while sales by volume have increased. This has meant negative price inflation in some sectors, obliging retailers to sell more items just to stand still let alone grow. This cannot be sustained ad infinitum, particularly as increasing sales volume further is becoming much more difficult.

Customers in 2008 will be looking for more to inspire them to spend more. This means adding more value; better quality, better functionality, greater relevance, fashion, styling etc.

When used purely as a reactionary tactic, under current market conditions, sales and promotions run the risk of failing to achieve the intended result and should be scrutinised more closely than ever before.

Reversion back to a more ‘traditional’ model of using sales for stock clearance purposes would provide greater solace, but this might require a significant change of mindset, both on the part of retailer and consumer.

A more scientific approach to pricing strategy is called for, which optimises demand against price throughout the product life cycle.

Retailers which focus on their value proposition and use sales and discounts/promotions as a planned, strategic tool are most likely to be more successful.

Retailers should make efforts to add value to drive sales rather than reduce prices.

I've checked for the notification that this comes from The Department of the Bleedin' Obvious but cannot actually find it.

I wait with breathless anticipation to see what new retail strategies emerge!
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: [info]green_knight
2008-02-19 06:18 pm (UTC)

(Link)

I frequent one online store where I just won't buy anything at full price. At all. I'm buying at 50% when I can get it, 40% if it's a low-price item, 30% if it's an utter must - but even that is rare.

I know sooner or later everything will be reduced, and I've been burnt a couple of times too often, so that's it. Reduced price only.
And I do the same with books, really - I buy them when they're reduced, or second hand, or not at all. The only things I buy at full price are books by people I want to support. If you can reccommend an indie bookstore locally, I'm willing to frequent it - but is ther much point in buying in a bricks-n-mortar Waterstones?

My personal feeling is that the whole UK economy is a South Sea Bubble. My experience in Chester where there _were no jobs_ (Agencies, minimum wage jobs, and the same small number of really crappy jobs that were advertised every few months nonwithstanding) was rather negative - right now, it looks ok, but that's without the frantic paddling under water...
[User Picture]From: [info]slovobooks
2008-02-19 08:18 pm (UTC)

(Link)

It's a terrible thing that what has been obvious to some of us all along can take a Think Tank years to notice...
[User Picture]From: [info]martyn44
2008-02-19 08:41 pm (UTC)

(Link)

In the words of the patron saint of modern British retailing. 'Pile it high and sell it cheap'.

Only you can't merchandise everything as though it were a tin of own brand baked beans - however easy it might seem.

Oh, and look at the effect of Lord Cohen's philosophy on so many of Tesco's suppliers.

Don't expect logic from the British retail industry any time soon. Not until a fair number of the lemmings have drowned. Which is not an attractive proposition if you are a supplier . . .
[User Picture]From: [info]wolfinthewood
2008-02-19 10:02 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Interesting piece. Thanks. As you say, nothing really new in that piece, but I welcome anything that offers some kind of challenge to the lunacy.
[User Picture]From: [info]kateelliott
2008-02-19 10:36 pm (UTC)

(Link)

There's a word or phrase for this form of consumerism, but I can't think of what it is. I think it goes along with credit card debt. Something about living in a world of illusion?
[User Picture]From: [info]cherylmmorgan
2008-02-19 11:49 pm (UTC)

(Link)

A couple of key phrases:

A more scientific approach to pricing strategy is called for, which optimises demand against price throughout the product life cycle.

Yes, but most of them don't have good enough IT to achieve this.

this might require a significant change of mindset, both on the part of retailer and consumer.

It is all very well us thinking this is bleedin' obvious, but does the average consumer think it is bleedin' obvious? I've seen a few studies on this sort of thing and I suspect that most people are far more likely to buy something that claims to be reduced than something at the same price that isn't reduced.

Advertisement